Skip to content

Conversation starters that work with strangers online

Three opener shapes (observe, offer, ask) that give a stranger something easy to answer, plus the reasons 'hi' and 'asl' go nowhere.

LustAI Editorial7 min read

Three paper keys on a ring beside a small lock shaped like a speech bubble, on a warm desk

The cursor is blinking, the other person is a complete unknown, and "hi" feels too small while anything longer feels like too much. Here's the way out: a first message only has one job, handing the other person something easy to reply to. Every opener that works does that in one of three shapes.

Why is starting a conversation online so hard?

Talking to someone with no profile, no shared friend and no context is a strange task. In a café you'd have a queue, a weather, a barista. In a random chat you have a blank box and a person who is just as unsure as you.

Two things make it feel worse than it is. First, we predict that talking to strangers will be awkward and drain us. In Nicholas Epley and Juliana Schroeder's 2014 study, commuters expected a chat with a stranger to be unpleasant, then reported enjoying their journey more when they actually had one. Second, after a first conversation, people consistently guess that the other person liked them less than they really did. Erica Boothby and colleagues called this the liking gap, and it showed up in short chats and in weeks-long friendships alike.

So the nerves are real, but the forecast behind them is usually wrong. The other person is more willing to talk, and more pleased that you did, than your head is telling you.

Why do "hi" and "asl" go nowhere?

"Hi" is not rude. It is just empty. It hands 100% of the work to someone who knows nothing about you, and the honest reply is another "hi", which leaves you both exactly where you started.

"Asl" (age, sex, location) is worse, because it asks for personal facts before you've earned any trust. Most people read it as a screening question, not an invitation. Even when someone answers, you now have three numbers and a place name, which is nothing to build a conversation on.

Long openers fail for the opposite reason. A five-line introduction about your job, your city and what you're looking for is a form, not a message. There's nothing to reply to except "cool".

The fix in all three cases is the same: put something in the box that a stranger can pick up in one line.

What does a good opener look like?

Think of a conversation as passing a ball back and forth. The first throw should be gentle and aimed at the other person's hands. In practice, every reliable opener has one of three shapes.

Observe. Point at something you both share right now. In a random chat that's the situation itself: the hour, the app, the tag you both picked, the fact that you were paired at all.

You could say: "We both chose 'travel' as a tag, so a fair question: last trip that was actually good, not just Instagram good?"

Offer. Give a small, true detail about yourself and invite one back. Small is the key word. A detail is an open door; a life story is a wall.

You could say: "Confession: it's 1 a.m. here and this is my third cup of tea. What's keeping you up?"

Ask. Request a low-stakes opinion. Harmless "this or that" questions work because they have obvious first answers and a natural follow-up ("why?").

You could say: "Settle a debate. Pineapple on pizza: crime or genius?"

There's research behind the third shape. In a 2017 study across live chats and speed dating, Karen Huang and colleagues found that people who asked more questions, especially follow-up questions, were liked more by the person they were talking to. Questions signal interest, and interest is attractive in every kind of conversation.

A first message is a throw, not a speech. The lit ball is the reply you're inviting; a good opener makes it easy to catch and throw back.

How do I write an opener that isn't boring?

Boring openers are generic; interesting ones are specific. The difference is one concrete detail. Compare:

GenericSpecific
"How's your day?""What's the one thing that went right today, even if it was tiny?"
"What do you like to do?""You picked 'films'. What's the last one you actually finished in one sitting?"
"Where are you from?""Is it morning or night where you are? Guessing from the typing speed, it's late."
"Tell me about yourself.""Two truths and a lie, chat edition. Go first, or should I?"

Notice that the specific versions never require a profile. They use what's already in the room: the time, the tag, the medium itself. That's the whole trick for chats with no bio to read.

One more test before you hit send: can the other person answer in one line? If the honest reply would take a paragraph, shrink the question. If the honest reply is "ok", add a hook.

What to try tonight

Here's a short routine you can run the next time the cursor is blinking.

  1. Pick a shape. Observe, offer or ask. Don't overthink it; any of the three beats "hey".
  2. Add one specific detail. The hour, the tag, a tiny true fact about your evening. You could say: "Rainy Tuesday here, which explains why I'm talking to strangers. What's your excuse?"
  3. End on a question with an easy first answer. This-or-that questions are the safest: "coffee or tea", "beach or mountains", "last song you played". Then follow up on whatever they choose.
  4. Keep it to two sentences. One hook, one question. Length is not warmth.
  5. Reply to what they actually said. If they answer "tea, obviously", your next line is about tea, not about you. Pull the thread they handed you.
  6. Send at most two openers. If the first gets nothing, one gentle nudge is fine: "No pressure, just testing if this thing works." After that, let it go.

What does a real first exchange look like?

Here's an opener of the "observe" shape playing out over the first six messages. Nothing clever is happening; it's just easy throws.

You: We both picked "music" as a tag, so honest question: what's the song you'd be embarrassed to admit you have on repeat?

Them: haha ok. a very old Britney track. no further comment

You: No judgement, that era was undefeated. Is that your gym song or your kitchen song?

Them: kitchen. cooking is the only time i sing

You: Same, terribly. What do you cook when nobody's watching?

Them: instant noodles with way too much chilli, you?

Three of your messages, three of theirs, and you already have a topic (food) and a small shared joke (the kitchen singing). That's a conversation. From here, the topic ladder for chatting with a stranger gives you plenty of rungs to climb.

Do the same openers work on voice or video?

Mostly yes, with one change: on a call, the observation is usually about the call itself. "Your audio is crisp, are you on headphones?" or "That's a serious bookshelf behind you" are both observe-shaped openers that need zero preparation. The offer shape works too: "Fair warning, my accent is a mix of three countries, so stop me if a word sounds odd."

What changes is timing. In text you can take thirty seconds to craft a line. On video, a long pause before the first sentence reads as hesitation, so it helps to decide your opener before you press connect. Have one this-or-that question ready as a spare; if the first exchange stalls, "quick one: sunrise person or sunset person?" restarts it. If the idea of a live call makes your stomach drop, that reaction is common and there's a short read on why nerves before a video call are normal.

What if I get nothing back?

Sometimes you send a good opener and the reply never comes. That's information about their evening, not about you. People leave chats because a friend called, because their battery died, or because they were only half-there to begin with.

Send one follow-up at most, keep it light, then move on. Don't send a third message and never send an angry one; the stranger owes you nothing, exactly as you owe them nothing. If you keep hearing silence across many chats, the problem is more likely the shape of the opener than anything about you, and the table above is the place to start.

There's a quiet upside to all this practice. Gillian Sandstrom and Elizabeth Dunn found that even brief exchanges with people we barely know, the kind of small contact you'd have with a barista, are linked to a stronger sense of belonging and a better mood. Every opener you send is a small deposit, whether or not that particular chat goes anywhere.

Is it normal to freeze on the first message?

Completely. Most people type, delete, retype and then send something plain because the plain thing felt safe. The way through is not confidence; it's a template. Pick a shape, add a detail, ask a small question. When the chat is up and running, the small-talk handshake and the threading technique for keeping a chat alive will carry you the rest of the way. And if you find yourself paired with people you have nothing in common with, choosing better interest tags fixes more openers than any script.

For more on listening, silences and kind goodbyes, browse the rest of our conversation skills guides.

Questions people ask

What is the best way to start a conversation with a stranger on the internet?
Give them a small thing to react to. Name something you both share (the time, the tag, the app), or ask for a quick opinion on something harmless. One or two sentences is plenty.
How do I start a conversation without saying hey?
Replace 'hey' with a sentence that carries a hook: an observation, a tiny confession, or a question with two easy answers. 'Late-night snack or early breakfast: which are you?' does more work than 'hey' ever will.
What should I not say in a first message?
Skip anything about looks, age or location, anything copied from a list of 100 openers, and long paragraphs about yourself. Those either put the other person on guard or leave them nothing to reply to.
Why does nobody reply to my openers?
Usually the message is too generic to answer, or it asks for too much too soon. Try openers that end in a question with an obvious first reply. Silence also happens for reasons that have nothing to do with you, so send two at most and move on.
Is it weird to message a stranger first?
No. Everyone in a random chat is there to talk, and the person who goes first is doing the other one a favour. Research on strangers who were asked to talk found both sides enjoyed it more than they predicted.

Sources

  1. Epley, N. & Schroeder, J. (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  2. Boothby, E. J. et al. (2018). The liking gap in conversations: Do people like us more than we think? · Psychological Science
  3. Huang, K. et al. (2017). It doesn't hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Sandstrom, G. M. & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Written by LustAI Editorial. We write plain-language guides about talking to people online, staying safe and feeling good about it. Every piece is researched against primary sources, edited by a human, and reviewed again whenever we update it.